Media
Style, politics and TV
Yesterday Canadians voted and contrary to the expectations of the numerous, almost weekly survey polls, it was not a close 3 way race but
a Liberal Party landslide!
If Donald Trump had been asked, he would have predicted the great
Liberal victory just as he has almost destroyed the Jeb Bush run for the
White House with two words: "low energy".
Mr Bush has excellent job experience and is a progressive
Republican but wears a suit and tie too often and is usually subdued in
his body language and speech: i. e., no waving arms and theatrical
jesters, no bellowing or pounding the table. Put simply
he, like most of the candidates from both U.S. parties, comes across on TV
as subdued if not wimpy.
In a media universe where Iron Man and 007 and gross humour
comedies rule the big screen, and the walking dead and vampires and
bloody medieval tales rule the small screen, and when violent video
games make more money than movies, movie rentals and movie streaming,
boredom sets in quickly. Put simply, politicians who dress
conservatively -- tie and suit - and who often resemble wooden statues , have minimal appeal.
In our recent Canadian election, Prime Minister Harper continued to
look and speak and physically move in the old school fashion and so too
the staid NDP leader, Thomas Mulcair.
As for the election winner, Justin Trudeau, only 7 years in
politics and just 2 1/2 years as a party leader, he was a breath of
dramatic fresh air as one would expect from a teacher of drama.
Trudeau, in media clips and ads, was almost always seen without jacket, often
tie-less and with sleeves symbolically rolled up. He always flashed
his great and friendly smile, walked in a fast, energetic pace -- when on
the street and meeting people, and was constantly moving his arms and
speaking
with passion.
The Liberal advertising slogan proved true: people wanted "change
now", and as The Donald would have predicted, if 2 of the 3 competitors
are stiff and dull, the winner will be Mr. Energy.
Hopefully the Liberal promises and plans will work too, because in
the end, substance, i.e., government policies, is far more important
than the glowing face of an energized leader with good hair -- or one
with a bad comb over job.