MEDIA
Will the U.S. election end with a tie?
This 2012 U.S. election will end with a tie. No, not a tie in the popular vote on November
6 nor a tie in the Electoral College. What will decide who in the next
president of the United States will be the ties the two men wore in their final
debate. Do you prefer Obama’s solid blue
tie with tiny squares or Romney’s bright red and with broad stripes that looked
purplish on my monitor?
While this may sound ludicrous, so too have been the post-debate
‘popularity polls’ and American reaction.
Issues are of little import in the world of TV broadcasting. ‘Looks’,
not words are key as McLuhan long ago recognized. Style, not substance, rules in this visual
medium as Neil Postman lamented in Amusing Ourselves to Death.
Put simply, on TV, whoever ‘looks’ more dynamic and assertive – in dress
and body language - wins the audience over at the emotional/subconscious
level.
Winners are the male lions and male peacocks who expand their manes or
feathers to look more powerful and impressive. Losers are sloths and worms –
slow moving or simply yucky.
What Americans should be paying attention to is their different world
views on the role of government: minimalist vs. active on the economy, social change and foreign policy. Those are the three real issues of this
election.
But these get lost in combative exchanges filled with –
at best -- half-truths from both sides. In such a confusing environment, and
given TVs visual bias, ‘looking good’ is the deciding factor.
After watching segments of the first debate I knew within
minutes Obama was in trouble. His
cropped haircut with visibly grey curls sprouting everywhere was no match for Romney’s distinguished grey sideburns and jet
black mane of hair. Obama rarely moved
his arms and looked wooden, tired and ill while Romney used every chance to
stand broad shouldered, with a glowing smile, leaning forward
aggressively. In brief, Romney looked the
star quarterback and Obama the 90 lb weakling who couldn’t ever make the team.
These visuals revived Romney’s presidential numbers among viewers polled
the next day and has since given his campaign huge momentum.
Question: How did those listening
on RADIO react? Did Obama do so poorly
when only his voice and tone were available for judgement – alongside his
positions on the issues? No one seems
to have bothered polling such people or even asking the question.
In 1960, the first televised presidential debate between Vice President
Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy, radio listeners gave Nixon a 60% to 40%
victory, but the larger TV audience reversed the ratings.
On TV, Nixon, recently hospitalized, showing 5 o’clock shadow and sweating under
the studio lights was no match visually for the tanned, non-sweating and constantly
smiling Kennedy.
And the rest is history.
So, why are the two fabric ties worn in the last debate so important? Because by now most pundits and the public
believe the two men are each at 47% of the popular vote. The earlier debates have ‘balanced out’ as
one win for each – based on demeanor and flash.
Obama, the reigning champion, rose from the ring floor and did well in
debate # 2 -- like a Rocky.
In the final debate, forced to sit at a round table inches apart, physical
dynamism was minimized. Both men sat and spoke with little body language or
energy. Poor lighting and camera choices
did not help either, as Obama’s dark skin looked two dimensional on my screen and
Romney’s often wrinkled forehead and pale face were not inspiring.
Both men wore what seemed to be identical black suits – same colour and
cut -- and only their ties were distinctively different.
As they constantly threw conflicting information and numbers at each
other, their ties, for once, galvanized
my attention and probably that of most viewers.
My wife did not see the debates but when I asked her which tie she would
prefer – as described above – she chose the blue one.
So, based on this scientific poll of one, and a female perspective at
that, Obama will win.
No comments:
Post a Comment