Part 2 - plastic shopping bags
The demonization of thin
plastic shopping bags supplied by stores - usually for FREE - is also a misguided
disaster.
All the advantages of
foam cups apply to plastic bags: easily storable in small spaces, light weight
and always sanitary.
They are also extremely inexpensive
and help retailers with their bottom line and keep consumer prices low.
The totally flexible and
super strong, leak proof bags with their sturdy plastic hand holes allow
for an enormous amount of items to be carried at once: up to 3 bags per hand.
Try doing that with paper bags whose glued-on handles
regularly snap off with heavy loads or whose bottoms weaken and tear when
frozen ice cream or refrigerator grade jars build up moisture in hot weather
and 'sweat'.
Reusable fabric or plastic shopping bags - which have become the rage - are also a problem.
Q. What is the life
cycle costs of such fabric or sturdy plastic bags?
Q. Do you need to regularly
wash their interiors or spray the insides with disinfectant?
And as with the shift to
mugs, reusable bags have become a manufacturers’s dream as this craze has also gone
ballistic!
They are not only
sold at numerous grocery stores but even tourist shops with clever sayings,
iconic images, etc. They are also frequently given out free as marketing tools
by retailers, banks and all kinds of organizations.
As a result, my two (2)
person home has accumulated over a dozen (12+) bulky plastic and fabric bags; a
glut filling up my car trunk, back seat, garage space and/or indoor storage.
According to “a study
released in 2011 by the Environmental Agency of England, “In Evidence: Life
Cycle Assessment of Supermarket Carrier Bags”, they state that a
reusable cotton shopping bag must be
used at least 173 times before it
becomes as environmentally friendly as an expendable plastic bag.”[i]
But who ever gets 173
uses? The handlers of the fabric ones
regularly tear off when carrying heavy loads, and the handles of study plastic
ones become weakened with repeated use and tear off as well -- though not as
quickly.
Health risks from
bacteria are also significant. According to a study by the University of
Arizona and Loma Linda University,
reusable grocery bags are breeding grounds for deadly
Salmonella and E. coli, and allow for easy food cross-contamination.[ii]
Accordingly, the article by Emmam Howe in Green Living, it advises[iii]:
·
Cloth bags need to be machine washed regularly using
detergent and a hot dryer (preferable to air drying).
·
Plastic reusable bags must have their insides
scrubbed with hot water and soap and left to air dry regularly.
·
Have at least 4 to 5 purpose-designated bags: one
for raw meats (and fish/seafood); one for fruits and vegetables; one for
pre-packaged goods; one for any baby or child bottles, toys, etc.; and a separate
one for gym gear [as sneakers, towels, etc. can spread athlete’s foot[iv]].
And, as a final note, reusable bags must be
kept dry and COOL. Stored in a hot area
or car makes Samonila bacteria grow faster[v].
Finally, she reminds readers “to put raw meats [and raw fish/seafood] into a
separate disposable plastic bag before putting them in a reusable bag. This
helps to prevent any juices that drip off of raw meat packages from touching
other foods and contaminating them.” So
much for avoiding PLASTIC!
Reality check:
Q: Does anyone really
get 173 uses out of a cotton bag before it breaks or becomes worn or badly
stains?
Q: How many people do
the recommended regular washing and disinfecting? I know I am too lazy, and even using Lysol
spray disinfectant requires hanging up the bags to dry for up to an hour.
Q: How viable and
practical is trying to keep these bags “cool (and dry)” in hot climates?
I live in Canada and
only have to worry about heat during the 3 months of summer, but in southern
USA and other more tropical areas, heat and humidity are challenges that can be
8 to 12 months a year!?
Q: Having to bring with at least 3 different sets of bags for raw meat/fish/seafood, raw fruits and vegetables, and packaged goods– possibly more than one for each category of purchases, is simply a pain and unrealistic?
Confession: I often go out to buy
toothpaste or a box of detergent or some other signle item and end up buying a
lot, lot more: items I forgot I needed but that are sitting on the shelves
before my eyes, and super discount specials which I cannot resist.
As I often tell the
cashier when she asks if I want plastic disposable bags, I mutter, “Yes, I need
them. Came for a single small item and
got carried away. And my car - filled with 5-6 reusable bags - is some 3 to 5
minutes walk away in the parking lot!”
Welcome to reality!
And, of course, those
simple, FREE, thin plastic bags once home can have a second career: as liners
for kitchen garbage and compost and recycling
bins – as recommended by my City of Toronto (2.5 million people) Waste Wizard website[vi].
In my home, they are
reused as liners for bathroom waste bins and desk/office waste bins. Currently,
we use 11 – YES, eleven – at a time!
And, if someone has
allergies or gets sick and constantly keeps tissue boxes nearby, these FREE
plastic bags can be used as sanitary bin liners and help prevent the spread and
lingering of germs and viruses.
And, finally, did I not
mention these free disposable plastic bags are recyclable[vii], take up minimal space
in landfill, and will eventually decompose. (Claims range from 150 years
to 500 years to 1000 years.[viii] All are speculative
estimates[ix] as plastic bags were only
invented in 1960s in Sweden.[x])
So attacking and banning these versatile, sanitary and inexpensive plastic shopping bags is foolish and simply misguided.
So attacking and banning these versatile, sanitary and inexpensive plastic shopping bags is foolish and simply misguided.
Additional information
from “Banning plastic
bags won’t save our planet” by Bjorn Lomborg, (G&M, June 17, 2019, A15) is worth noting:
- California, which has already banned thin plastic bags to eliminate 40 million pounds of plastic, has seen an increase in store bought trash bags by 12 million pounds, and the replacement paper bags - 83 million pounds worth – increase CO2 emissions. [And don't forget those paper bags required the killing of millions of trees!]
· And if you found surprising the 2011 English government study that discovered a cotton bag would need to be used 173 times to match a plastic bag, a 2018 Danish Ministry of the Environment study – taking into account the ozone layer and other factors, determined a single cotton shopping bag would need to be used 20,000 times – YES,
20 x 1000) before it would cause less climate damage than thin plastic bags.
Used twice a week, that amounts to 191 years! Or, as I would put it, more than twice the life expectancy of anyone living in the Western, developed world!!!
· Even an ordinary paper bag would have to be reused 43 times – yes, forty-three times- before its impact is less than a thin plastic bag!!!
·
As for harming the oceans, Lomborg notes:
- Plastic bags account for less that 0.8% of all plastic that enter the oceans.
As for harming the oceans, Lomborg notes:
- Plastic bags account for less that 0.8% of all plastic that enter the oceans.
· - Only
5% of any plastic that reaches the oceans is from OECD member, ‘developed’
countries.
· - 27%
of all plastic reaching the oceans is from CHINA (even though they banned
disposable plastic bags in 2008) and 33% comes from just 3 other countries: INDONESIA, PHILIPPINES and VIETNAM.
·
- - And, lastly, 70% of all plastic in the oceans comes from the fishing industry: nets, fishing lines and buoys.
- - And, lastly, 70% of all plastic in the oceans comes from the fishing industry: nets, fishing lines and buoys.
ANOTHER REALITY CHECK!!!
[iii] Ibid.
[vii]
Ibid.
[viii]
For 150 years, see https://www.google.com/search?q=how+long+for+disposable+pastic+bags+to+decompiose%3F&rlz=1C1CHBF_enCA690CA690&oq=how+long+for+disposable+pastic+bags+to+decompiose%3F&aqs=chrome..69i57j33.14480j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 For figures of 500 years and 1000 years
see https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2007/06/do-plastic-bags-really-take-500-years-to-break-down-in-a-landfill.html
No comments:
Post a Comment